tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4197168174795670409.post2854720427319073401..comments2023-09-23T08:18:55.536-07:00Comments on Two Marshals: Skirmish on the L'Adour - 15mm Napoleonic Muskets and TomahawksShedmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17463995777686946355noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4197168174795670409.post-47636148494717447482015-03-13T03:02:42.921-07:002015-03-13T03:02:42.921-07:00sounds good to me - especially the Cavalry charge....sounds good to me - especially the Cavalry charge. I wouldn't let cavalry charge infantry defending a linear obstacle. maybe give the Aggresiveness bonus only on the first round - if the infantry haven't run after the initial combat then it should be a straight fightShedmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17463995777686946355noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4197168174795670409.post-44782719012767720792015-03-10T00:45:16.380-07:002015-03-10T00:45:16.380-07:00I of course meant the Square formation not ColumnI of course meant the Square formation not ColumnKaspar Olesenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18441882954959118638noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4197168174795670409.post-6579447531863815012015-03-10T00:20:08.296-07:002015-03-10T00:20:08.296-07:00Thanks Alan,
The retreat from Moscow was IMO much...Thanks Alan,<br /><br />The retreat from Moscow was IMO much more skirmish like and I'm not sure that the Column formation is something I would add to the game. I was thinking about giving Cavalry a +1 bonus to Aggresiveness when in melee with infantry. I also plan to create a Cavalry Charge similar to the Bayonet Charge in the rules. The last thing is a rule about infantry not being able to charge cavalry straight on, only from the Rear.Kaspar Olesenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18441882954959118638noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4197168174795670409.post-2854570696489947202015-03-09T17:50:37.151-07:002015-03-09T17:50:37.151-07:00Hi Kaspar
Pretty basic melee rules for cavalry at...Hi Kaspar<br /><br />Pretty basic melee rules for cavalry at the moment - I've only done cavalry vs cavalry<br /><br />Attacker<br />Lance moving into contact +1<br />Lance other occasions -1<br /><br />Defender<br />Armour +1<br />Infantry not in Square vs cav -1<br />Infantry in Square vs cav +2<br /><br />I allow cavalry to breakthrough a single line of opponents as well as breakoff or remain in contact<br /><br />I'm looking at doing a cavalry vs infantry square scenario just to see how it works<br /><br />nice blog btw <br /><br />Alan<br />Shedmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17463995777686946355noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4197168174795670409.post-42396634058984226372015-03-09T06:47:43.639-07:002015-03-09T06:47:43.639-07:00Hi Shedman,
this is very interesting indeed. I hav...Hi Shedman,<br />this is very interesting indeed. I have been trying to use M&T for Napoleonic Retreat from Moscow games. Had our first game yesterday and 80-90% of the rules seem too work. The main issue is with the Cavalry rules. There is no obvious advantage to cavalry in melee once you get past the first round. I am very interested in hearing what rule changes you have come up with for cavalry.Kaspar Olesenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18441882954959118638noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4197168174795670409.post-85406626078004652132015-03-06T09:17:32.434-08:002015-03-06T09:17:32.434-08:00This terrain is really amazing, I do like your hil...This terrain is really amazing, I do like your hills especially...great report!Philhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08913029478686087197noreply@blogger.com